

Different fields.
One axis.
Bi Eksen Group brings the capabilities a brand needs in order to grow under one roof. Our three companies operate independently in their own fields; shared management, shared standards and shared capital discipline are the group's responsibility.
/01
3
Group companies
/02
4
Fields of activity
/03
8
Areas of expertise
/04
2026
Year founded
Why we built a group
Bi Eksen Group began when three independently run companies kept meeting at the same client's table. One team built a brand's campaign, another wrote the page it landed on, and the coordination between them fell to the brand itself.
That coordination load looks like a small friction, but it decides the outcome: the campaign is ready and the page is late; the page is ready and measurement was never set up. Nobody made a mistake, and the work still did not move.
We built the group to give that gap an owner. Today the three companies operate independently with their own brands and teams; the coordination between them is the group's responsibility, not the client's.
The three jobs the group takes on
Capital and direction
Growth plans, investment decisions and resource allocation are discussed at group level. We do not trade a long-term position for a short-term gain.
Shared services
Finance, legal, people and technology infrastructure sit in one place. Standards none of the three could afford alone become reasonable when shared.
Standards and audit
Contracts, reporting, information security and ethics follow a single standard set by the group. The companies cannot fall below it.
Group Structure
Bi Eksen Group is the shareholder and management roof of three companies; the companies operate independently with their own brands, teams and clients.
Group Structure
Comparison
The three roads open to a brand
Get in TouchA group roof
Scope: Strong — Marketing, brand and software together
Continuity: Strong — Same team, same timeline
Accountability: Strong — The group owns the outcome
Cost: Strong — One contract, predictable
Best suited to: Strong — Anchoring growth to a system
A single agency
Scope: Limited — Limited to the agency's discipline
Continuity: Strong — Stable team
Accountability: Strong — Agency owns the agreed scope
Cost: Limited — Work outside scope costs extra
Best suited to: Strong — Going deep in one channel
Scattered suppliers
Scope: Limited — Each job with a different supplier
Continuity: Limited — A separate timeline per supplier
Accountability: Limited — Accountability is diluted
Cost: Strong — Looks cheaper at the start
Best suited to: Strong — Small, one-off pieces of work
